Population: 1,198,491
Varanasi
ReligionEducationHistoryMore...
More Topics...

How bad is traffic in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh?

five local experts
Share
Share

Nobody likes traffic. Not a single soul. Here's what five local experts had to say about traffic in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. Perhaps you'll find some tips to avoid rush hour and some potholes.

Leave a comment

Varanasi is an ancient, but one of the most polluted city in India. Traffic is utterly horrible. The roads have potholes and the system is corrupt. Still, you will find that the people are very accommodating. They are very open and conversant. The City of Ghats won’t disappoint you if you can tolerate the corrupt system.

Neeraj, says: 2020

Pros:
1. Famous for ghats and religion. Varanasi is known for its ghats and rivers. know as the city of Lord Shiva.
2. City of culture. Various places in varanasi is famous for culture like sarnath.

Cons:
1. Due to various development activities lots of dust in some areas.
2. Some area face a lot of traffic jam during working hours.

Prakash, says: 2020

Varanasi, also known as Kashi, is beautiful. Foreigners visit ghats and mandirs. The major problem that a person can face here is traffic. Once you visit this place he/she will fall in love with the vibes. People here believe in lord Shiva more than any other god as this place is known as Shiv ki Nagri. People here greet each other by saying Har Har Mahadev.

Varanasi is an ancient city with congested roads and streets but with a lot of diversification in terms of food, shopping and exploring different ghats and temples. The city simply defines itself as holy city so it is an place of religious connectivity. If one seeks connectivity with almighty Varanasi is the ultimate destination.

There are many temples. It is a very congested place. There is many Shiva temples in the main city. There is famous ghat called Manikarnika Ghat. Narendra Modi was an MP of Varanasi.

Shahbaz, says: 2020
ReligionEducationHistoryMore...
More Varanasi Topics...

Comments are closed.

Names of respondents may have been changed.

Share
Share